Monday, December 17, 2012

Top Ten Most Anticipated Movies of 2013

Well, 2012 is coming to an end, and assuming the world doesn't end this coming Friday, 2013 has more than a few releases I'm looking forward to, and since there are still three movies coming out for me to see before I make my "Best Of" list, I might as well do my most anticipated of next year. So, without further explanation needed (I think), here's my most anticipated films of next year:


Honorable Mention: Sin City; A Dame to Kill For

One of my many, many weird habits is that I don't believe a movie exists until it's being sold to me; i.e. until I see a trailer. No trailer has been released for the long-awaited sequel to 2005's Sin City, and compounded with the fact that this movie's been in the works for eight years, plus the fact that some of the principle roles have yet to be cast, I'm not getting my hopes up too soon. Still, according to the ever-reliable news sources of Wikipedia and IMDb, A Dame to Kill For is coming to theaters next October, and even with the ever-controversial Frank Miller lending a crazy hand to the proceedings, Robert Rodriguez is back to making movies for grown-ups. That alone is worth getting excited about.



10) Jack the Giant Slayer

Another of the suddenly popular 'revisionist fantasy' genre, this is one that's been stuck in development for some time, having intended to be released in February 2011 and now coming in March 2013, reportedly so that Warner Bros can perfect the film's visual effects. Development hell doesn't bode well for any picture, but this one still gets my interest because of four words: Directed by Bryan Singer. Say what you will about his disappointing Superman Returns; he's had a hand in all of the good X-Men movies and he's proven himself as a great director of action and character beats. That alone has me interested.

No Poster
Available

9) End of the World

Okay, this is sort of weird since I just said I don't believe a movie exists until it's being sold to me a mere two entries ago, but the premise of this one is a killer. In End of the World, we see the apocalypse from the point of view of Hollywood's most available. A party with James Franco, Seth Rogen, Jay Baruchel, Jonah Hill, Michael Cera, Craig Robinson, Emma Watson, Rihanna, and others is interrupted when the end times come. You can't put that many funny people and also Rihanna in one movie and not expect to get some laughs. Until the trailer hits, settle for the fake trailer that inspired the real movie.


8) Man of Steel

Here's the short version: Marvel has won the movie race. They're not winning right now and DC just needs to catch up; the race is over and they've won. The Avengers came out, a movie that teams a space god, a dude in a robot suit, and a man whose entire character can be summed up as "good guy", while DC Entertainment is struggling to get their Amazon princess flick off the ground. Marvel went for the silly crap and came out ahead for it. DC's trying to make their characters relevant and modern and edgy, and that's handicapping them and keeping them from making Avengers-level money. Until they can figure out how to do someone besides Batman in movies, they're always gonna be lagging behind the House of Ideas.

That's why I'm apprehensive about Man of Steel. Yes, I'm gonna see it, I'm just worried it's gonna reach for being The Dark Knight but just end up as another Superman Returns, or (god forbid) a Green Lantern. Bottom line is that I'm apprehensive, but eager to see the results. Plus they got Zack Snyder directing it. Say what you will about Sucker Punch or 300; at the very least, the dude knows how to make things look good on film, and hopefully, the story will be good enough to match Snyder's visuals. So who knows? Might be the first step in DC expanding it's film base and making their proposed Justice League movie happen in 2015.


7) Star Trek into Darkness

J.J. Abrams first Trek movie was flawed, but ultimately a really fun ride that showed a lot of respect for the old show. In addition to having the dumbest film name in the franchise, the sequel hopes to do the same as the first and improve upon it by making TV's Sherlock Benedict Cumberbatch the main villain. I can think of few ways of improving a movie than adding Benedict Cumberbatch to the cast. Couple that with all of the stuff that made the first movie good and you've got a sequel I really want to see.


6) Oz, the Great and Powerful

I feel like it's 2001 again, and cult-favorite director Sam Raimi is showing the world how to make a blockbuster. After helping to elevate comic-book movie to it's current dominance with his Spider-Man trilogy, Raimi is now tackling L. Frank Baum's most famous books. Great and Powerful serves as a prequel to the more famous story already captured on film, telling the origin of the Wonderful Wizard as he first comes to the world-famous fantasy land. Visually, the movie borrows from both the classic film and Baum's vivid descriptions of the Land of Oz from his books, and if the trailer's any indication, the result will be bloody gorgeous. Great and Powerful looks like an absolute blast from a director who, above all else, knows how to have fun.


5) Iron Man 3

Marvel's first movie post-Avengers trades in regular director Jon Favreau for Shane Black, who previously directed the well-received crime film Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, also starring Robert Downey Jr. Here in Iron Man 3, it appears they'll be borrowing from Warren Ellis's story arc, Extremis, which I never read, but involves a techno-organic virus that changes how Tony Stark interfaces with his armor or some such comic-book pseudo-scientific BS. Whatever, THE MANDARIN IS IN THE TRAILER! The Mandarin, a character who I never thought we'd see on film because he's so firmly rooted in the Cold War, is not only in the film and played by Oscar-winner Ben Kingsley, but is put right there in the trailer. See, DC Entertainment and Warner Bros? THAT'S how you do a movie!


4) Much Ado About Nothing

Joss Whedon: So I've got a new movie...
Me: I'm in.
Joss Whedon: It's called Much Ado About Nothing...
Me: I'm in.
Joss Whedon: It's based on the Shakespearean comedy...
Me: I'm in.
Joss Whedon: It stars a bunch of my usual people...
Me: I'm in.
Joss Whedon: I filmed the whole thing at my house in black and white...
Me: I'm in.
Joss Whedon: And I also did the music for it.
Me: I'm in.
Joss Whedon: You wanna see it?
Me: ...I guess so.


3) Thor: The Dark World

Again, we have no trailer as this will be a November release, not a summer blockbuster. Still, I'd be jazzed about this one if they put it out on a Tuesday in September. Details on the exact plot of Thor 2 haven't been released yet, except that the villains have been cast, with 9th Doctor Christopher Eccleston playing the dark elf sorceror Malekith the Accursed, and actor whose name I can only enter through copy-pasting Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje as fellow dark elf Algrim the Strong, a.k.a. Kurse. Really though, the big seller for me is that it's a Thor movie. I loved the first one because it dove in headfirst with all its goofy Norse mythology and by the looks of things, they're doing the same with the sequel. Forsooth!



2) The World's End

So how does Edgar Wright follow-up directing my favorite movie of all time Scott Pilgrim vs. the World? By going back to the well, and re-teaming with Simon Pegg, Nick Frost, and the rest of the gang to complete their Three Flavours Cornetto trilogy with the comedy film The World's End (not to be confused with my #9 pick, the End of the World). The World's End is actually the name of a fictitious pub, one of many that the film's characters attempt to visit as they try to recreate a legendary pub crawl from their youth. However, things don't go as planned, the actual apocalypse may or may not be happening...look, I don't know the details. All I know is that Edgar Wright is making a movie, and therefore, I am obliged to see it. That's enough for me.



1) Pacific Rim

So Guillermo Del Toro made a movie that's a tribute to Japanese Kaiju stories, and it's about Godzilla-style giant monsters attacking the Earth and humanity fights them with giant humanoid robots that can punch them in the face and Idris Elba's in it and the ship's AI is voiced by Ellen McLain of Portal fame and OH MY GOD PUT THIS MOVIE IN FRONT OF MY EYES RIGHT NOW AAAAAAAAAARGH!!!

So that's my list. What are the movies you're most looking forward to next year? Post 'em, discuss 'em, but most importantly, see 'em. Thanks for reading and I'll see you next time!

Friday, December 7, 2012

Moments of the Week, 12/5/12

Fans! Friends! Readers! That guy! Welcome back to another semi-thrilling installment of Moments of the Week. Yes, I've been off for a while, but I've had finals so SHUT UP! But now that they're done and I'm soon to head back to home, I figured I might as well unwind with a little writing about comics. So here they are, my favorite moments of this weeks comics!


Simply Terrific
Earth 2 #7

You can go ahead and ignore that cover. Hawkgirl and Green Lantern don't fight in this issue, they just have a conversation, Hawkgirl does something that pisses off GL, and leaves. Really, this issue is a "dust settling" issue, which are actually my favorite kinds; these decompressing one-shot stories that occur after a big event where there's not much action and it's mostly characters reflecting on what just happened.

The meat of this story concerns the leader of the World Army, Commander Amar Khan (Yay diversity in comics!), in the aftermath of Solomon Grundy's attack, wherein genius and sociopath Terry Sloan was brought in to discretely consult the W.A. despite being one of the most wanted men on Earth. Commander Khan is displeased by this turn of events, but can't do anything about as the higher-ups want Sloan and his tremendous intelligence on board. Khan, naturally, takes matters into his own hands and gets his covert Canadian strike force team the Sandmen (led by Wesley Dodds, of course) to canvas all of Sloan's secret bases and seize any world-destroying assets he might have. And what do they find in Sloan's super-secret Paris hideout? Mr. Terrific!

Yes, Michael Holt, the third smartest man in the world and regular Justice Society of America member (before the reboot) is finally joining the plot, which makes me very happy. I think he's a cool character and while it's a bit disappointing that his solo book failed, I love that writer James Robinson and editor Pat McCallum were able to pick up the pieces and integrate him into their fancy new JSA book. I'm looking forward to seeing him join this "new age of heroes", as well as the spy vs. spy, cloak and dagger story of Khan vs. Sloan. Earth 2 isn't classic JSA, but it's a pretty damn decent substitute.


Ooooh...pretty...
All-New X-Men #3

I honestly don't have much to say on this issue. It's neat, gives some characterization to Cyclops, Magneto, and Emma Frost and how their brush with the Phoenix in Avengers vs. X-Men has affected their powers (although curiously Magik, another member of the Phoenix Force Five, has greater control over her mystical abilities while Emma and Cyclops have less). However, the real draw here is Stuart Immonen on artwork. The dude should be locked up for homicide because he is KILLING IT in this book. I mean, look at that cover! That thing makes me want to cry, it's so beautiful! Fantastic looking book, and once the decompressed storyline gets to the big action setpieces, it'll read fantastic too.


Assemble at Dawn
Avengers vol. 5 #1

The more I think about, the more I like Jonathan Hickman's first issue of Avengers. It missteps in some ways, but it's a strong outing and gets you excited about what's to come from Earth's Mightiest Heroes.

The books starts out by reminding us of Hickman's mission statement for his Avengers run: "We need to get bigger". And after flashes of things yet-to-come (par for the course for Hickman), we get our initial fight. New supervillain Ex Nihilo has already terraformed Mars, and wishes to turn Earth into a new Garden of Eden. This is actually interesting because it raises questions of where he came from; this technology seems like it's beyond Earth's reach but he's using biblical references and speaking English. I'd be interested in seeing his origins in later issues.

Without any discussion shown, the Avengers set off for the red (now green) planet; specifically, the movie Avengers (Cap, Iron Man, Thor, Hulk, Hawkeye, Black Widow). It's a smart move on Hickman's part, showing a team that new readers will be familiar with in action, right before they're kicked to the curb by Nihilo and his entourage. Nihilo send Cap back to Earth, hoping that seeing the world's greatest hero defeated will break the spirits of the people. Instead, Cap calls an all-new Avengers team made up of classic members (old and new), plus some completely unheard-of heroes joining the ranks. Why is an obscure character like Smasher or an anti-hero like Hyperion rubbing elbows with Spider-Man and Captain Marvel? Who is the new woman who wields the power of Captain Universe? Why is Wolverine still running with the Avengers if he has a school to run? How cool is it that one of my favorite characters from Hickman's Secret Warriors (teleporter, mathematician, and reality-bender in training Eden Fesi) is going A-List? All these questions and more answered, next month!

Marvel NOW! is, surprisingly, shaping up to be pretty good. Here's hoping that upcoming series like Young Avengers, New Avengers, and Guardians of the Galaxy can live up to the example Uncanny Avengers and Thor: God of Thunder have set. Thanks for reading, and I'll see you next time!

Thursday, November 15, 2012

Moments of the Week, 11/14/12

Hey. It's been a while, hasn't it? I've been busy with school and stuff. You know how it is.

Anyway, I used to do a blog where every week I'd talk about comics specifically. I abandoned it because it wasn't feasible for me to do on a weekly basis (read: I'm lazy). However, I've decided to do something similar to that with MOMENTS OF THE WEEK!, wherein I look at the comics I've bought this week and talk about the parts of them I liked and felt like highlighting. Will this be a regular thing? Probably not, but we'll see. Without further adieu, here's this weeks best moments!

Meet the Parents
Saga #7

Saga's back and still the best comic on the stands. Issue seven picks up where the last one left off: Marko, Alana, and baby Hazel are on a rocketship that's also a tree and their ghost babysitter has been banished by the sudden arrival of Marko's mystical parents. Writing that sentence alone makes me love this series even more. In this issue, Marko teleports to the nearest planet that Isabel was banished to, with his mother in pursuit, leaving his wife, his daughter, and his father alone in one same place. That's a conversation that did not disappoint, with Alana's bitter snark bouncing off Barr's legitimate concern for his granddaughter. It's awkward, it's grounded, it has a sudden surprising twist ending; it's Saga. And I'm glad it's back.

The Truth About Shining Knight
Demon Knights #14

When we last left our heroes, they were in Hell, in their own individual torments, so really there was no place to go but up. And although Vandal Savage got the best line in the book again ("These are my children. Would please kill them?"), the real big moment went to Shining Knight.

In the pre-New 52 continuity, in the before time, in the long long ago, Shining Knight was a survivor from the Celtic version of Camelot, a woman who posed as a man to squire for Sir Galahad and became an accomplished knight in her own right. In Demon Knights, the gender thing is toyed with; Sir Ystin identifies herself as a man, the other characters see through her claim, but humor her ("The Celts have odd ways. Nod and smile.") The matter is settled when Exoristos, the exiled Amazon warrior, asks Sir Ystin to live with her. Shining Knight responds with this:

"I think you like one...aspect of who I am. But I'm the other, too. I was born this way. I've kept saying whenever anyone asks. I'm not just a man or a woman. I'm both. Is that alright with you?"

So...yeah...that's a trait of a lead character in a mainstream American comic book, published by one of (if not the) most prolific company in the industry. Then again, I suppose we should expect as much from writer Paul Cornell, who earlier in the same series depicted the greatest kingdom in the land as ruled by two princesses (yes, in that way). Still, I never thought I'd see that kind of character in a comic book AND see it done well, so kudos to Cornell for writing and kudos to DC for having the guts to publish it.

Creepy Clown Time
Batman #14

After showing everyone how it's done in the Court of Owls story arc, Batman's creative team of Scott Snyder and Greg Capullo tackle the Dark Knight's most prolific foe: the Joker. How do they do it? By writing the scariest Clown Prince of Crime in Batman history. They may just end up succeeding by journey's end.

This is a Joker that is truly capable of anything; not just in the sense of he's insane enough to come up with any plan, but smart enough to make it work and driven enough to see it through. In his first faceoff with Batman (heh heh, it's funny cause he had his face cut off), the Joker explains his plan: he believes Batman's gone soft, and blames this on his supporting cast, so he's gonna kill them, after making this bone-chilling statement:

"So let's cue the music and the lights and -- ahem, ahem -- I'll clear my throat and speak as loudly as I can. I'm even going to say it so your little Bat-family can hear it, too -- over the police wire. So are you there? Are you listening, little Bat-kiddies? Good...
...BECAUSE I KNOW WHO YOU ARE!"

The Joker is about to make it personal. He's already hit Commissioner Gordon and captured and tortured Alfred, and the rest of the Gotham Knights are next on his list. Oh yes, there will be blood, and I, for one, am looking forward to it.

So what did you think about this weeks comics? Did you read any comics this week? Post your thoughts and comments here, or anywhere really, just so long as you're engaged. Thanks for reading and I'll see you next time!

Sunday, August 12, 2012

Top 11 TV Deaths



As I sit here in SeaTac Airport, waiting 2.5 hours for Midwestern weather to let our plane fly to New York and contemplating whether or not I should jettison my Vista-operating laptop at 30,000 feet, I decided now's as good a time as any to do a new post: my personal pics for the Top 11 Deaths of characters on Television.

Some guidelines and ground rules: 1) This list will be based on how dramatic the character's death was and what impact it had on the rest of the show. 2) There will be spoilers. These picks are at least a few months old, but still, if you're sensitive about that sort of thing, turn back now. 3) The character has to have died on the show, not in a movie or comic spin-off. 4) The character ideally should stay dead. This rule will get bent a bit, but whatever. 5) It's my list, my shows, my opinions. If you disagree with my selections or feel a character was left out, make your own damn list. This is mine and I will make it as I see fit. 6) Why top 11? Why the cuss not?

So, without further adieu, here are my selections for the Top 11 TV Deaths!

11) Frank Archer
"Laws and Promises", Fullmetal Alchemist

I'm not a big anime fan, let's say that right off the back. I don't have anything against the genre/medium/whatever you want to call it, I just don't think I'm ever going to bury myself in Japanese animation as so many often do. However, I watched Fullmetal Alchemist, and I did like it, and of the numerous deaths on the show, it was Lieutenant-Colonel Frank Archer (Sorry, Hughes).

Archer is introduced partway through the series as a member of the state military under one of our protagonists, Colonel Roy Mustang. Unlike Mustang and the rest of his subordinates, Archer has a love of war and violence, seeing them as both a sport and a way to move up the ranks of the military. To this end, he turns the state's attention to controversial weapons projects and eventually leads a violent raid on the peaceful city of Lior. However, this turns out to be a trap, which results in some of Archer's men being killed and Archer himself losing the left half of his body.

He survives (because at the end of the day this is a cartoon) and is rebuilt as a cyborg. His sanity is shattered by this, with his love of bloodshed and the military now an obsession. When he learns that Mustang is attacking the head of the military, the corrupt Fuhrer-King Bradley, Archer goes on a mad rampage through the city of Central to stop him. He arrives too late to save the Fuhrer, but not too late to kill the severely weakened colonel. As he's about to attack, he is shot dead by Mustang's partner and potential love interest, First Lieutenant Riza Hawkeye, thus putting an end to the metal monstrosity for good.

Frank Archer's death wasn't particularly dramatic or even unexpected, but by god was it cathartic. With him defeated, the audience could let out a breath of relief; the Fuhrer was dead, Mustang and Hawkeye were alive, and the immediate threat to the military characters had passed. All that was left was the fight for our main protagonists, the Elric brothers, but that's a story for another time.

10) Joyce Summers
"The Body", Buffy the Vampire Slayer

I had to include at least one death from a Whedon show, and since I couldn't include Hoban Washburn as per my own rules, this is the death I picked. And oh man, what a death. Or, really, what an aftermath.

In a departure from the expected, Buffy Summers's mother Joyce died in a wholly ordinary fashion, having suffered a stroke after a successful brain surgery to remove a tumor. What follows is one of the best episodes of television ever made, with the reactions from most of Buffy's supporting cast (Spike didn't show up): from shock to confusion to panic to sadness to a complete lack of understanding about mortality. However, it's Buffy's reaction that's the strangest: numbness. After coming to terms with her mother's death, she initially doesn't know how to properly react, and so just, in her own way, shuts down, drifting through the process of dealing with an immediate death with little emotional response.

Joyce Summers was a fantastic character and TV mom: patient and understanding but strict when she needed to be, out of the loop but still cool. Her departure was tragic, but gave us one of the best episodes, not just of the show she came from, but of television itself.

9) Calculon
"The Thief of Baghead", Futurama

Calculon is one of the oldest robots in Futurama, having been created in the 21st Century and since then been most of the greatest robot actors of the next millennium, including Acting Unit 0.8, Thespomat, and David Duchovny. Currently, Calculon stars as Calculon on the long-running soap opera All My Circuits; at least he did, until his 'untimely' death.

In the seventh season episode "The Thief of Baghead", Calculon challenges the greatest actor of the 31st Century, Langdon Cobb, to an acting competition in order to save the world and the lives of the Planet Express crew (long story, watch the episode). Calculon chooses Romeo's soliloquy at Juliet's deathbed as his monologue, one which culminates in the character's suicide. In order to ensure his victory and his place as the greatest actor of the 31st Century, Calculon decides to actually kill himself onstage at the end of the performance by drinking a vial of food coloring (which, as we all know, is poisonous to robots). He gives the performance of a lifetime and a deathtime before ultimately passing, much to the tragedy of no one in particular.

Calculon's death is played up for comedy, but honestly, you couldn't ask for a better way for that character to go out. He was a fun character who will definitely be missed...until they replace him with another model, that is.

8) Shane Walsh
"Better Angels", The Walking Dead

The conflict during part 2 of season 2 of The Walking Dead (besides the zombies) was the escalating conflict between protagonist Rick Grimes and deuteragonist turned antagonist Shane Walsh (I know big words!). As leader of the survivors, Rick was of a mind that they had to act with kindness and compassion in the post-apocalypse, while Shane believed those ideas died out with the rest of the world and that survival of the group at all costs was paramount. After going behind Rick's back on many issues, Shane confronted his former best friend and held a gun to him, but Rick refused to engage, daring Shane to shoot an unarmed man. Shane relented and Rick approached his former best friend and stabbed him. But it didn't end there!

The event was witnessed by Rick's son and Shane's godson Carl, who seemed to both be shocked by and understand his father's motivations. And then Shane rose from the dead as a walker. And it was Carl who put him down, thus revealing the truth to the Grimes's that anyone who died rose again, and that they, the survivors, were the walking dead.

Shane's departure was inevitable but pitch perfect, with Rick finally relenting to his friend's demands and protecting his wife, his son, his unborn child, and the rest of the survivors, no matter what it cost him or anyone else. Come season 3, we'll see a change in Rick, in Carl, and in the dynamic of the show, one which I am eagerly anticipating.

7) Godric
"I Will Rise Up", True Blood

Remember when True Blood was good? Remember when it wasn't high camp trying to masquerade as supernatural drama? Those were good times, weren't they?

Godric was essentially vampire Jesus, a two-thousand-year-old bloodsucker who acts above all with compassion, patience, and peace, as demonstrated during his escape from anti-vamp church group the Fellowship of the Sun, where he forced both humans and vampires to cease fighting and let the undead leave unmolested. When it's revealed to the vampire higher-ups that Godric allowed himself to be captured as a way to placate the humans and keep peace between the two factions, he was forced to resign from his position as sheriff of Area 9. This, combined with his utter failure to keep peace between humans and vampires, led him to the conclusion that he was tired of being alive, and that it was time for him to meet the sun. As stood on the roof of a hotel at dawn, waiting to pass on, Sookie Stackhouse waited with him, giving something he didn't expect to have at 2,000 years of age: surprise, that human would show him such compassion.

Like Calculon, Godric's farewell is fantastic but tragic because he was such a great character. He's pretty much the only person in the whole of the show who is both a good person and not obnoxious, annoying, or useless. It's no mystery why he keeps coming back to visit Eric, acting as his conscience and spiritual guide in times of trouble. Vampires don't come back from the dead (yet), but if they do, I know who'd be at the top of my list of characters who should return.

6) Gustavo Fring
"Face Off", Breaking Bad

It all started with a box cutter. Or a knock on the door. Or a hit and run. Or a kid with a gun. Wherever the chain of events began, it ended with a bang. Season 4 of AMC's now-legendary crime drama Breaking Bad was about the game of cat and mouse between protagonist, meth cook Walter White, and his boss, restaurant owner, philanthropist, and drug kingpin Gustavo Fring. After a season-long battle for the loyalty of Walt's partner Jesse Pinkman which ended in Walt's favor, it was finally time for the big man to go down.

In the climax of a somewhat complex plan, Gus was lured into a one-on-one with his old rival, former cartel enforcer and paraplegic mute Hector Salamanca, with Gus finally going to kill the old man. In a moment of silence, Hector finally looked the man in the eye, quietly apologizing for everything he had put Gus through, just before he activated the bomb, provided by Walter and strapped to the bottom of Hector's wheelchair. In the moments just after the explosion, Gus Fring walked out of the room and, with half of his face blown the hell off (hence the episode's title), calmly adjusted his tie, and fell to the floor, dead.

There was no question that Gus would die by the end of season 4, but damn if he didn't go out with a quite literal bang. His calm after the event, his moment with Hector, the split-second before the explosion when he realizes what's going to happen; all perfect. Gustavo Fring was a fantastic character, a villain like only Breaking Bad could present, and seeing him go was inevitable and fantastic and tragic all at the same time. My hat goes off to the people who made all of that happen.

5) Kenny McCormick
Several episodes, South Park

This one's a cheat, since the character has returned from his many, many deaths, but I would be remiss if I didn't include South Park's resident death-prone child. Kenny makes it to the list due to the sheer amount of fatal encounters he's had, the comedic meaningless of them, and the creativity that went into writing them.

Kenny's death was actually given some dramatic heft during the fifth season episode appropriately titled "Kenny Dies", where he succumbs to the decidedly unfunny muscular dystrophy and dies permanently. However, you can't keep a good Kenny down, and he makes a pseudo-return in "A Ladder to Heaven", when Cartman drinks Kenny's ashes (mistaking them for chocolate milk mix, as one does) and thus traps Kenny's soul in his body (luckily there's room enough for two in Cartman's body). The soul is later exorcised by local chef Chef's voodoo-practicing parents in "The Biggest Douche in the Universe", where it is moved to a pot roast, which is subsequently lost, found, and eaten by actor Rob Schneider. Two episodes later, at the end of season 6's finale "Red Sleigh Down", Kenny returns, mind, body, and spirit, at the end of the episode, with no explanation.

Kenny's constant resurrections are explained in season 14's three-part "Mysterion" trilogy as the result of his parents attending a Cult of Cthulu meeting years ago, but to me, it's always funnier if he is simply an unfortunate child, living in a cartoon world, who simply refuses to stay down.

4) Rita Bennett
"The Getaway", Dexter

More than anything else, Rita's death at the end of Dexter's outstanding fourth season was a shock. It happened offscreen, there was little foreshadowing, and the fallout would take the entire fifth season to play out. And it was even kind of sad.

A single mother of two, Rita Bennett was initially used as a tool of forensic analyst and vigilante serial killer Dexter Morgan; the presence of a girlfriend was an integral part of his cover as a normal person. However, as time went on, Dexter became more humanized and grew quite fond of Rita, to the point of marrying and having a kid with her. However, it was not to last. After examining the life of family man and fellow serial killer Arthur Mitchell (played by scariest actor alive John Lithgow), Dexter makes an enemy of the Trinity Killer, and their game of cat and mouse dominates the final quarter of the season. He is eliminated by the end, but not before killing Dexter's wife, leaving her body in an overflowing bathtub and Dexter's infant son sitting and crying in the pool of blood, eerily mirroring the traumatic event that turned Dexter into the man he is today.

Season 4 of Dexter was about balancing a family and life as a serial killer. Season 5 was about dealing with tragedy and what happens next. It was all possible because of the death of Rita Bennett. More than anything, Rita's death proved that in an information age of leaks and spoilers, you can still be shocked by the ending of a story.

3) Eddard Stark
"Baelor", Game of Thrones

No, I didn't read the book beforehand and didn't know this was coming, and yes, that does play a big part in why I picked it. But it's still a good death and, above all else, it's my list. Deal with it.

In season 1 of Thrones, Eddard Stark is brought out of his home in the far north of the nation of Westeros to the capital city to serves as Hand of the King. He accepts the job, mostly because his honor demands it but partially because he wants to investigate the mysterious circumstances under his predecessors death. Ned discovers that the former Hand was murdered by the queen, Cersei Lannister, to hide the fact that she had been in a relationship with her brother and that all three of her children were fathered by him and not the King, Robert Baratheon. Ned confronts Cersei and gives her a chance to leave with her children and her life in tact, but shortly after the king is grievously injured, and names Ned as the new king until such a time as Robert's eldest, Joffrey, comes of age. Instead, Ned tries to pass the baton to Robert's brother (who is the next rightful heir), but is too late: Joffrey has seized the throne and locks away Ned after he refuses to bow.

While in jail, Ned is offered a deal: if he admits to treason and bends the knee to the new king, he will be exiled rather than killed. Ned refuses at first, but relents when he realizes that his daughters could be punished for his mistakes. Ned stands before the city and proclaims Joffrey the true king. However, Joffrey goes back on his word and has Ned executed. Just before the sword comes down, Ned spies his daughter Arya in the crowd, alongside a soldier of the Night's Watch, and knows that at least she'll be safe. With that, he closes his eyes and awaits the king's justice.

Ned Stark's death was a shock for anyone who hadn't read the books, especially when you consider that HBO propped up Sean Bean as the main character of the show. More than anything, however, the death of Ned Stark had fallout. The rest of the show (and the book series) is a war sparked by Ned's death, fought between an ever-changing number of armies with characters drifting between sides, making tough decisions, and, of course, dying. Ned Stark was killed for doing the right thing, and he dragged a whole lot of people down with him.

2) Jane Margolis
"Phoenix", Breaking Bad

Yep, Breaking gets two spots on this list. It's just that good.

Jane Margolis is introduced as the landlady/neighbor of Jesse Pinkman. The two start dating and things are going alright until she discovers Jesse's profession as a meth cook. She relapses into drug addiction, first with meth, then with heroin, and gets Jesse hooked on the junk too. Eventually, Jane is found out by her father and forced into rehab. She negotiates to give her one day before leaving to prepare herself. Instead, Jane and Jesse make a plan to do one last hit, then leave Albuquerque and get clean for good on their own.

That night, Walter breaks into Jesse's house to take him away and get him clean, but while doing so, he accidentally knocks Jane on her back, who, still in the throes of heroin, begins to asphyxiate on her vomit. Walt goes to help her but stops, realizing that she's an enabler to his partner, and allows her to die. After she's gone, there's a moment of horror on Walt's face over what he's just done before he leaves without saying a word.

Jane's death was absolutely shocking, more for Walt than for anyone else; seeing him allow someone to die was a huge step towards turning him into a truly irredeemable character. It sent Jesse into a spiral of depression for much of season 3, it contrived a reason for Mike "Coolest Character on Television" Ehrmantraut to join the cast, and it lead to her depressed father, an air traffic controller, to cause the ABQ plane crash of 2008. Jane Margolis was a tragic character, an otherwise successful person whose life was destroyed by her own vices and the people around her.

1) Henchman #24
"The Family That Slays Together, Slays Together, part 2", The Venture Brothers

Henchmen 21 and 24 were one of many double-acts on the action/sci-fi/fantasy satire The Venture Brothers. In this case, their shtick was a parody of supervillain henchmen; nameless foot soldiers who inevitably get arrested or killed by the good guys. Unlike the rest of their henchmen brethren, 21 and 24 were lazy, incompetent, and, above all else, self-aware. They knew how ridiculous their lives were, and went along with it anyway. This, as well as pure dumb luck, allowed to survived numerous near-death encounters...until they didn't.

In the season 3 finale, the now-fugitive secret agent Brock Samson engineered a war between his pursuers, the Office of Secret Intelligence, and the Monarch's forces. As the two forces did battle on the lawn of the Venture Compound, 21 and 24 were, predictably, far from the fray, hiding out in the monarchmobile and watching the fight from a monitor. When the car is hijacked by the Venture's loyal robot H.E.L.P.eR., 21 escapes, but 24 is trapped when the seatbelt he needlessly buckled jams. At the end of the episode after the battle is over, neither side has won, the Venture clone army is revealed and subsequently wiped out, and Brock Samson learns he wasn't actually a fugitive, Brock quits and decides to take the monarchmobile (which has arrived at the battlefield) and leave. Just before he gets to it, the car explodes, destroying H.E.L.P.eR. and killing 24, his still-flaming head landing in the hands of a horrified 21.

Henchman 24's death has all the criteria of a great fictitious death: it was dramatic, it was shocking, it was sudden, it was unexpected, and it had fallout: over the course of season 4, Henchman 21 turned from a fat, bumbling moron to a muscular, competent fighter and leader (though no less a pop-culture geek). 24 was a really fun character, his double act was hilarious, and his departure from the show was sad. And that is why Henchman 24 has, in my opinion, the greatest death on television.

So that's my list. I started it on Thursday and finished it on Monday. In a different time zone, no less. I gotta get more punctual. Anyway, hope you enjoyed reading it and I'll see you next time.

Thursday, July 19, 2012

The Emerald A-hole



Adaptation of a property from one media to another is a funny tightrope to walk. The problem with most adaptations is that they stray too far from the source material, losing touch with what made the property unique in the first place. On the other hand, going too close to the material has it's share of problems to. I'm a huge fan of "Game of Thrones", but the fact that I've read the books beforehand means I know all the major surprises and plot twists (e.g. Remember when Davos took Melisandre into the caves beneath Storm's End and watched as she "cast her spell"? Remember how weird and sudden and freaky it was to see onscreen? I don't).

One of the benefits of adapting American superhero comics is that they're long ongoing serials; creative teams change all the time, so if you're adapting from a comic, you're not tied down to adapting one single story. The details can be tweaked and altered and even downright changed, so long as the core ideas and characters of the comic remain consistent. Unfortunately for the CW, this is not the case for their latest superhero drama that was previewed at Comic-Con: Arrow.

Green Arrow is a character who, for a long time, didn't have much of an identity to himself. Created in 1941, Green Arrow was more or less a cross between Robin Hood and Batman; a skilled archer who fought corruption with no superpowers, neat gadgets, and a plucky teenage sidekick. Still, he was a big part of DC Comics in the Golden Age, but it wasn't until the Bronze Age of comics (roughly the late-sixties to mid-eighties) that he became a unique character. Comic-book legends Denny O'Neil and Neal Adams wrote a now-famous storyline in which Green Arrow and his similarly colored friend Green Lantern traveled across America, solving blue-collar crimes, averting disasters, and arguing politics. Yes, politics. Green Arrow became unique because of his leftist political agenda, something which has stuck with him, even today.

Not in the show Arrow, though, where's pretty much just Batman except he goes after corporate crime instead of bank robbers and supervillains. Also he kills people.

The story is a faithful adaptation of GA's origin: Oliver Queen is a billionaire playboy womanizer with no sense of responsibility and...y'know what? I'm just gonna save time and say he's Tony Stark from the beginning of "Iron Man". Anyway, Ollie is hanging out on his boat, avoiding his father and sleeping with his girlfriend's sister, when sabotage in the middle of a storm destroys it, leaving only Ollie, his dad, and a third guy of no consequence alive, all floating on a life raft. Robert Queen, realizing he's not long for this world, gives his son a list of names of corporate scumbags who need to be taken down. Robert and third guy die soon after, leaving Ollie alone when he finds himself on a desert island. Five years and one unanswered question later, Ollie is found and returned to civilization, where he acclimates to his old life by becoming an archery-using vigilante, targeting the evil corporate people his dad told him about as Green Arrow (or maybe he's just Arrow, his name isn't given in the pilot).

The episode has some good things going for it. The writing is not awful; what I mean is I didn't feel myself actively getting dumber when I watched it (and that's saying something for a drama on basic cable). There are two new characters added to the Arrow mythos who are kinda compelling: John Diggle, an ex-military something turned bodyguard to Ollie and named after GA writer Andy Diggle, and Thea Queen, Ollie's younger sister who turned to drugs as a coping mechanism after her father and brother 'died' (although from the looks of it, she's using cocaine, which begs the question: where did a high schooler at a filthy rich academy get coke? Is she dating Dr. Rockso or do I just not know high school as well as I think? I dunno, I'm just saying Oxycotin might've made more sense). And the action is well shot. It's just unfortunate that the people fighting aren't too interesting or likeable.

If you scroll up to paragraph 4, you'll notice I mentioned our fearless hero kills people. Sadly, I wasn't exagerrating. Twice in the pilot does Ollie take people's lives: the first are a set of kidnappers who capture Ollie and interrogate him to find out what happened during his five years on the island (because apparently that's what the mystery of the first season will be). Those are fairly forgiveable as it was self defense. The second are a crew of bodyguards hired by one the corporate scumbags after GA threatens him. This is actually very troubling because the bodyguards were simply doing what they were paid to do; their boss may be an asshole, but that's not their fault. They're not trying to enforce his evil corporate ways, they're trying to put food on the table or put kids through school or pay off a mortgage or something equally relatable. But no, their paycheck comes from a bad place so they have a take an arrow to the knee (and the chest).

There are other minor things that get to me (Merlyn, an evil bowman, professional assassin, and GA's archenemy, is now recast as Ollie's best friend who's secretly an asshole), but the biggest problem with Arrow is that's trying so hard to be a Batman show. That style of superhero might be what's in now, but it's not true to Green Arrow. Green Arrow has his own unique identity, his own circumstances, and, after seventy years of continuity, his own character. Arrow fails as an adaptation because it ignores that in favor of what's easiest to digest: a bland story of a costumed vigilante that has been reseen and rehashed a thousand times already.

Arrow premiers on the CW on October 10th. I'm going to see where it goes after the pilot, but I wouldn't recommend you watch it. Thanks for reading, and I'll see you next time.

Saturday, July 14, 2012

On Why I'm Not Going to Comic-Con Anymore



I'd like to preface this post by responding to the obvious immediate criticism: that things I'm describing are "White People Problems"; trivial and unrelatable and, in the grand scheme of things, not worth think about. To an extent, this label is accurate, but really, this isn't about me complaining that the San Diego Comic-Con has become to mainstream (though that happens) or talking about how awesome this event can be (though that happens too). More so, however, this is about how I lost touch with something I'm passionate about.

I've been going to SDCC for eight years now, and for nearly every year it's been the highlight of my summer. However, it's become a bigger and bigger event each year, a nexus of all things popular culture to the point that comics (y'know, the third word in the title) have become something of an afterthought. Now I love going to the big panels promoting my favorite TV shows and upcoming films, despite the effort it takes to get into these panels. This year, however, broke me of that.

Today (Saturday, July 14th), my plan for Comic-Con hinged on me getting into Hall H and spending my day there (as rooms are not cleared between panels). At 6500 seats, Hall H is the largest venue at the San Diego Convention Center and is thus reserved for the most special of programs. Today was no exception: panels included Quentin Tarantino's Django Unchained, Warner Brothers' The Hobbit and The Man of Steel, and Marvel Studios' Iron Man 3. If was going to get in, I would have to get in line pretty early. Apparantly, not early enough.

I woke up at seven (which is early for me), took a bus and a trolley to the Convention Center and got in the staggeringly long line at nine. I was nervous, but confident enough that even if I missed Django (which I could live with), I could still get in for Warner Bros. After much waiting the line moved from the San Diego Marina to the tents outside Hall H, the last leg on the journey to panels. I missed Django (unsurprising), but was still optimistic that enough people would leave after that or after the following panel (the new Silent Hill movie). Django came and went and halfway through Silent Hill, the line hadn't budged a damn inch. An convention center employee then informed us that no one was leaving the hall and that we were very unlikely to get into Hall H. This was when I decided to leave.

The time between getting in line and leaving it was 9 AM to 2 PM. That means that for five hours, I waited for something to happen and walked away with nothing but distinct feeling of disappointment and a sore ass.

The day was filled with further minor disappointments, though I did manage to score a Team Fortress 2 t-shirt, an exclusive plushie of Wheatly from Portal 2, and a signed copy of Axe Cop volume 2 (lotta 2's in there I just noticed). But the final nail in the coffin happened later.

Determined to see at least ONE panel today, I decided to get in line for the last Hall H panel, one I was sure I could get into: the Q&A with Kevin Smith. I arrived in line an hour early (as is protocol for any Hall H panel) and got in ten minutes after it started to a room that was only half full. I spent six hours in lines today, and could accomplished the same thing I did with fifteen minutes.

Comic-Con has simply become too big. Don't get me wrong, there's still stuff to love: yesterday's Breaking Bad panel, for instance. It wasn't about revealing an exclusive scoop or special footage; it was about a writer, some actors, and four-thousand people sharing in a passion over an incredible drama. Another good example was Joss Whedon's Dark Horse panel; he spent two minutes reiterating his work with Dark Horse and fifty-eight minutes talking with fans. This is what I love most about Comic-Con: smart, talented, creative people talking about their passions to a crowd that shares them. Animosity and bitterness are put aside so that for one hour, a room full of strangers can agree that they love this one thing.

What I hate most about Comic-Con is days like today, when your love and dedication isn't enough, when you can wait five hours for something to happen and have nothing to show for it. I fear with the constant expansion of Comic-Con, the negative aspects will outweigh the positive, and I just can't be part of that. Comic-Con, I love you, I love the eight years we've spent together, but I just don't want to jump through these hoops and execute these protocols anymore.

Thanks for letting me vent, I'll see you next time for more positive thoughts. Maybe.

Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Further Assembly Required


This past weekend saw the release of Marvel's The Avengers (or Avengers Assemble, if you live outside the States), the culmination of five movies worth of film continuity as Iron Man, the Hulk, Thor, Captain America, and S.H.I.E.L.D. came together to overcome a threat that no single hero can defeat. I won't say much about it, except that IT IS AWESOME! IT IS THE MOST AMAZING SUPERHERO FILM I'VE EVER SEEN! IT IS SO DAMN GOOD! JOSS WHEDON MAY BE AN ATHEIST BUT HE HAS CONFIRMED MY BELIEF IN A JUST AND LOVING GOD! IT IS WONDERFUL! AAAAAH! AAAAAAAAAH! AAAAAAAAAAAAA

Sorry, got a bit carried away there. Anyway, the Avengers came out and it was great and made all of the money in the world, but at the end of it all the question comes up: Now what? Marvel showed that comic book style, genre-mashing continuity can work on the big screen; what are they gonna do next? What are the next characters to make it to the big screen? Iron Man 3, Thor 2, and Captain America 2 are all in development, while Ant-Man has been worked on for years by writer/director/my favorite British person ever, Edgar Wright, but what of new heroes and new villains? Well, I have some ideas. Here now is my list of the next ten Marvel characters who deserve their own movies:

10) Namor

Admittedly, the Sub-Mariner is a tough sell. He's a dude who has Spock-ears, winged heels, and regularly wears nothing but a green speedo. However, he's still a big part of the Marvel Universe. First appearing way the hell back when in 1939, Prince Namor of Atlantis inititally clashed with the surface world and its protector, the android Human Torch. However, when the prince learned of these big bad guys called Nazis who threatened both the topsiders and his own kingdom, he teamed with the Torch and Captain America to fight them off. He has since ranged from villain to anti-hero to just plain hero in his 70-year tenure in the Marvel U.

Since we've already seen Cap's story on screen Namor free, it'd take a bit of rewriting to put the Sub-Mariner in WW2. Say, maybe, have him fight the Japanese in the Pacific, go into hiding under the sea, and reemerge in the modern world to save it or conquer it in the name of Atlantis. And have him wear pants. Shirt optional.

9) Doctor Strange

Thor has thus far been the biggest example of magic in Marvel's Cinematic Universe, but Doctor Strange could give the God of Thunder a run for his money. Since first appearing in 1963, the Sorceror Supreme has been the go-to guru of magic and voodoo. The good doctor has been an on-again, off-again member of various Avengers and Avenger spin-offs (most notably, the Defenders), but never quite found solid footing as a solo hero.

As far as a movie, I'd go with a horror-fantasy type story. Tone down the costume, and Strange could be convincing as a demon fighter, maybe have Baron Mordo or the dreaded Dormammu as a villain. Then have Strange move on and team up with the similarly magic Thor or have him clash with the science-minded Iron Man. The possibilities are endless.

8) Iron Fist

At around the same time as David Carradine showed that white men could do kung fu, the Living Weapon was jumping and kicking his way through the Marvel U. In an origin story similar to another certain Iron-based hero, the young Danny Rand was a wealthy heir before he discovered his destiny; however, whereas Tony Stark found heroism through science, Danny found it through a hidden magical city in Tibet where he learned martial arts and killed a dragon. Since then, Iron Fist has been a part of the Marvel Universe, a classic member of the Heroes for Hire and, of course, occasionally with the Avengers.

While the story of a rich kid who learns what's important is attractive, I'd instead go with a story more akin to, well, Kung Fu; a spiritual hero whose goal is to bring peace to a world rife with violence and despair. Or do a whole movie of his training in the mystical city of K'un-L'un and have him emerge blinking into a crossover movie. Or, even have him team up with another hero, which brings me to number 7...

7) Luke Cage

Luke Cage, a.k.a. Carl Lucas, a.k.a. Power Man, a.k.a. a dude who wore a disco shirt and a tiara as his costume, started out his career in 1972, when blaxploitation was a popular trend in movies. Subsequently, when flamboyant costumes and the catchphrase "Sweet Christmas!" went out of style, Cage became a more thuggish, gangsta-esque character. Nowadays, he's just a big-time hero, married with a kid and a card-carrying member of the Avengers.

A Luke Cage movie would be tough to do; keeping the hero in his urban roots without being patronizing or pandering would be a tough trick to pull off. What would probably work best would be a redemption story, with Cage as a criminal who loses everything, gets the chance to make it right, and does so. Or just put him next to his old pal Iron Fist and watch the sparks fly.

6) Hulk

Mark Ruffalo's Bruce Banner was one of the best parts of the Avengers; alternatively a world-weary survivor and a weirdly upbeat scientist, Banner and his absolutely smashing alter-ego left a difinitive impression on audiences. As no more Hulk movies are in the works, it'd be a shame if the Jade Giant was left out in the cold. I'd suggest making a honest-to-god sequel to 08's The Incredible Hulk and pick up on the plot threads there, like Samuel Sterns becoming the super-psychic Leader, or bringing back Tim Roth as the abominable Emil Blonsky. Just don't leave Mark Ruffalo to do nothing; it might make him angry.

5) Moon Knight

Moony the Loony is one of Marvel's weirder heroes, but that weirdness makes him an utterly unique and compelling character. His origin story is as follows: mercenary Marc Spector is betrayed, beaten, and left for dead by his partner near a pyramid in Egypt. He is saved by Khonshu, the Egyptian God of the Moon, who resurrects him on the condition that he fight evil in Khonshu's name. Spector agrees and returns to the States, using his mercenary profits and Batman-esque weaponry to fight crime as the Moon Knight.

What makes Moony really interesting is the fact that he's absolutely bananas. He's still capable of being a hero, but the guilt of all the people he's killed as a mercenary manifests itself in Spector's multiple personalities (plus there's the fact that he takes orders from an Egyptian moon god). Moony's story could be one of redemption, with the voices in his head providing enough levity to keep audiences from noticing that he's kind of a Batman rip-off.

4) Nick Fury

One-Eyed Eagle has been a background presence in Marvel's movies, and while he does get more screen time in Avengers, he's deserving of his own movie, if only to see if Marvel will do a movie where the main character says "Motherf*cker" (they won't).

As far as a story, I'd adapt Jonathan Hickman's "Secret Warriors" to the big screen, with Fury and a small team of unknown superheroes waging a private war against a revitalized HYDRA. Part of this is because I love the comic, but part of it is because it really shows off the character of Nick Fury: a no-nonsense, absolutely brilliant espionage agent and mastermind who knows unequivocally what needs to be done to protect the free world and will do it, even if it's an unpopular decision. That's the character I know and that's the character I want everyone else to know.

3) Wolverine

Two reasons: One, because Fox got it wrong, and Two, because Wolverine is on EVERY team in Marvel Comics. That's his real mutant power. Need I say more?

2) Hawkeye and Black Widow

This one should be obvious. Two hot young actors playing badass master assassins/espionage agents who look awesome in the Avengers and are hinted at having awesome spy stories and possible romance subplots happening offscreen? Why don't these two have a movie yet?! Get on the stick, Marvel!

1) Agent Phil Coulson

Phil Coulson is the glue that holds the Marvel Cinematic Universe together. He's capable of being intelligent, funny, and even badass a few times (particularly in the Avengers). And despite all of this, we know so little about him. The people at Marvel created a really interesting guy; a character who is both an everyman walking amongst legends and an excellent administrator who knows how to manipulate them. Coulson is a great, fun character, and I'd love to see him carry his own movie.

Well, that's my list. If you've got any other ideas, post them here. Take care, go see The Avengers, and I'll see you next time. Until then,


Saturday, April 28, 2012

Caught in the Web

Hello there, children! This time, I'm doing something a wee bit different. As you may have picked up from this blog, I like a lot of things, and, as you most assuredly already know, a lot of things are on the internet, so therefore, a lot of the things I like are on the internet.

Wow, that was crap. Let's start over.

So this time around, I've decided to share a few things from the internet that I like and that I think you all should check out. This might even become a semi-regular thing. So, without further bad writing, let's get started. Here's some things from the internet that I like:

Extra Credits: Harassment

Extra Credits is weekly video series about video games; what's great about it, what issues have come up in the medium, and what can be done to make it better. This week, the EC crew looked at something that's been a longstanding issue in online gaming: Harassment. Rather than berate those who have made racist, sexist, or homophobic remarks in the anonymous forums of the Playstation Network, X-Box Live, and MMO servers, the crew offer tips on what gamers can do to prevent this behavior in the future. If you play online games and want to stop harassment, you should definately check this out.

Obscurus Lupa Presents: Heidi 4 Paws

Obscurus Lupa Presents is a semi-regular series in which Obscurus Lupa (a.k.a. Allison Pregler) reviews films you've never heard of, mostly Z-Grade martial arts movies and direct-to-video horror films. In her latest review, however, she takes a look at Heidi 4 Paws, an adaptation of the novel Heidi featuring a cast of dogs in costumes with rotovoxed mouths. Its as stupid and disturbing and hilarious as it sounds, so check out the review.

History of Power Rangers

I didn't watch Power Rangers as a child. Strange, I know, but my parents were under the impression that me watching anything more violent that Daffy Duck would turn me into a serial killer, so a show about teenagers using martial arts to fight Japanese stock footage was blacklisted. Thankfully, this particular hole in my childhood is being remedied. Linkara (a.k.a. Lewis Lovhaug), host of the comic-book review series "Atop the Fourth Wall", also does a show called "History of Power Rangers". It's pretty much what it sounds like; Lovhaug breaks down the story of each season of Power Rangers (in alarmingly comprehensive detail) and gives his opinions on it. With the latest installment up finally going up (it takes months for these things to get done), I figured now would be a good time to share it. It's a fun, interesting, and educational series; I, for one, for instance, learned that the show "Power Rangers" had a plot. No really, it's true. Go check it out.

Thats all I got for now, but I'll probably amass a bit more in the future. Thanks for reading and I'll see you next time!

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

Meanwhile, IN SPACE!...


Originally this post was set to be a users guide to Season 2 of Game of Thrones, explaining character names and personalities and family ties and so forth. However, my chronic procrastination has led that to be somewhat unfeesible, since we're almost halfway through the season. If you guys still want me to write that, say something. Anything. Please.

Anyway, on to today's subject. A question I often get asked is "Hey, man, when was the last time you got a haircut?" A question I wish I was often asked is, "What sort of comics should I read?" Of the many titles that come to mind, the first would be Saga.

Saga marks the triumphant return to comics of writer Brian K. Vaughan. Vaughan is something of a legend in comics, having written some of the most unique series of the past decade. Runaways took teenage rebellion to its extreme, with a group of kids discovering that their parents were a cabal of supervillains and, as the title suggests, run away. Y: The Last Man examined gender politics in the post-apocalypse, where a virus kills every mammal on Earth with a Y-chromosome, save for a nineteen-year-old slacker and his pet monkey. Ex Machina followed the world's sole superhero as he undertakes his most dangerous venture: politics. Then Vaughan disappeared, and nobody knew where he went. Actually that's a lie, he went to Hollywood and became a writer on Lost. Anyway, Vaughan is back with his latest gift to the masses, Saga, which is...well, it's Romeo and Juliet meets Star Wars. But's still unique and it's still a damn good book.

The setting is, of course, SPAAAAAAAAAACE! Specifically a galaxy still entrenched in an ancient civil war. On one side are the winged soldiers of the planet Landfall; on the other, the horned mystics of its moon, Wreath. In the process of this conflict, against all odds, love is found between enemies. Alana, a low-level prison guard with the Landfall Coilition, and Marko, a consciencious objector of Wreath, fall in love and elope together, returning nine months later with a pair of wedding rings and bouncing baby crossbreed. Unfortunately for the new parents, both sides get wind of Hazel the hybrid and send their best (or just most expendable) agents to retrieve the child. Alana and Marko are now on a search across the planet and across the galaxy to find a safe place to be a family, along the way dodging mystical horrors, freelance bounty hunters, and the powerful (but funny-looking) Robot Kingdom.

And we're only two issues in.

The books strongest point is its characters, and just how meticulously Vaughan presents them. The protagonists are definately likeable and you root for them, but at the same time you don't know much about them, which gives the book a sense of unpredictability that's rare on stories these days. The intrigue suggests that there's something more to the characters than they let on, which creates an effective hook and keeping the reader invested and the stories fresh. Anything can happen; not just in the sci-fi/fantasy elements, but with the characters as well. The shining example comes when Alana is confronted by one of the bounty hunters. I won't say what happens, but suffice to say she demonstrates a level of resolve that makes a much stronger character.

And then there's art. Oh man, is there the art. Fiona Staples (Woot! Female creators!) uses a sketchy, almost childlike style that adds to the sense of wonder of the book. The big epic images, such as a brief summary of the history of the war have a proper gravitas to them. However, where Staples truly shines is in the characters. Their acting is pitch perfect. Their facial expressions and body language is drawn in such a way that you know them and their disposition immediately, even the faceless members of the Robot Monarchy. It's beautiful artwork that invokes the same sense of amazement one had watching the Original Trilogy as a child (I imagine).

Saga is the book I didn't know I needed until I read it (that and Wolverine and the X-Men). Expertly written, with fantastic intrigue and characterization, coupled with stunning artwork that suits the book perfect. I cannot recommend it highly enough. DO. NOT. MISS. THIS. BOOK.

Thanks for reading and I'll see you next time!

Friday, April 13, 2012

Deeply Affecting



Yep, we're going back to this old business. Also, spoiler alert for the Mass Effect games.

To refresh your memory, this past March, Bioware released the third installment of their sci-fi video game trilogy, Mass Effect 3. While it was praised for its story, characters, gameplay, and RPG elements, much criticism was levied against the ending. Now, it's more or less expected that a big geek property like this would have some complaints, but the sheer amount of anger leveled against this ending was staggering. Fans petitioned Bioware to change the ending, to the point where Bioware stated that they would be releasing downloadable content that would add scenes to the end to tie up some of the loose threads, but that the original ending (Shepard gets teleported to the Crucible, talks to the god child, changes the universe, dies, maybe not dies, etc) would remain the same. And frankly, the whole affair kind of sickens me.

First things first, I'm going to echo a lot of other online personel in saying this: UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES SHOULD BIOWARE CHANGE THE ENDING TO MASS EFFECT 3. And the reason I say this and believe this is one simple, overriding fact: Video Games are art. Bioware put out a piece of art, and while those who take it in are more than welcome to dislike it, criticize it, or outright hate it, they are not entitled to have it changed. See, video games are tricky like this because, with DLC and patches they're an artform that can be modified and added to after release, and because they're an art form where the participant has an active role in shaping it, it gives the participant a certain sense of entitlement. It's the player's choice what Commander Shepard looks like, acts like, what he says, what he does, who he likes, who he hates, what gun he carries, what powers he has, etc. And having these choices and being able to shape this experience is great, but it doesn't make the player have the right to change the direction of the story of the game that Bioware made. Because Bioware made it, not the player.

Look, I don't want to be really hard on the "Take Back Mass Effect 3" people because really, they have a right to complain about the ending. But they shouldn't be demanding a change to it and Bioware shouldn't agree to those demands. When an art is changed to fit the wants and desires of its viewers, it stops being art and starts being a product. Changing the ending to Mass Effect 3 would set a terrible precident not just for Bioware, but for all video games. Bioware took a risk with the ending and while it didn't pan out exactly as they hoped, they shouldn't try to fix it, they (and everyone else) should learn from it and move on.

Now, the ending controversy didn't really get to me until I saw a Facebook ad for a Facebook game developed by Bioware. Now I try to ignore Facebook ads for the same reasons I do so for other ads and I try to ignore Facebook games because I can play real video games. However, this ad got to me because of the headline for it: "No Bad Endings".

When I read this, it suddenly struck me that the ending and the anger and bile surrounding it would be the most lasting part of Mass Effect 3. And that is bullshit. Having played through it for a third time now, I can safely say that Mass Effect 3 is a great game and should not be judged by one part that a lot of very loud people didn't like. This is a problem I hope to fix (even though I can't possibly do that, but shut up). So, with that in mind, here's a list of things I really, really like about Mass Effect 3 (bear in mind that people who haven't played any of the Mass Effect games will have no idea what I'm talking about, but may still get enjoyment out of it):

I like the sheer jaw-dropping epicness of seeing a Reaper land in the Thames River.

I like the terror you get when you stand on the moon of Palaven and watch the plaent burn.

I like that James Vega's only purpose in the game is to be a dumb guy that new players can relate to.

I like how the Warp power looks. It's just Incinerate or Freeze with different color scheme, but it looks really cool when you use it.

I like that Sabotage can turn enemy turrets against them.

I like that Martin Sheen still plays the Illusive Man and doesn't half-ass it for a second.

I like that Kai Leng's a total badass.

I like how Mordin Solus dies. It's like Spock in Star Trek II but less dramatic. The guy blows up while humming Rogers and Hammerstein.

I like Eve. She's just a nice character and good counterbalance to Urdnot Wreav.

I like that if you save Maelon's research data in Mass Effect 2, you can keep Eve from dying in Mass Effect 3.

I like that when you go to Grisson Academy, you see Jack being a well-developed person without losing her core characteristics. Plus she looks hotter with hair.

I like when you meet David Archer at Grisson Academy. He says he's been counting again, this time "the days I'm still alive thanks to you".

I like Joker and EDI. They make a weird but nice couple.

I like that no matter who you pick as your romantic option, it always feels like you should be with Garrus Vakarian.

I like that by the end of the game, you can kill Brutes and Harvesters without breaking a sweat.

I like how goddamn creepy the Banshees are.

I like that Liara T'Soni is simultaneously a sweet girl, a genius, a badass, and an intergalactic crime lord.

I like that at the end of the Rannoch mission, even if you do the morally right thing, there are still terrible consequences.

I like the mission in the Geth mainframe. It's trippy, big-idea stuff and it works.

I like the new resource mining system, or as I like to call it, "Grand Theft Reaper".

I like doing all the side-missions on the Citadel.

I like the mission on Sanctuary. I don't know why; maybe it's Henry Lawson's Aussie accent talking about indoctrination and Reaper technology.

I like hearing Admiral Hackett saying "Hackett Out" at the end of every conversation, because it means I don't have to talk to him anymore.

I like the Geth. They have a good look to them, they're well designed.

I like that part during the attack on London when you get a chance to call all your old friends to say "Good luck".

I like that Buzz Aldrin voices the Stargazer at the end.

I like watching a giant worm monster take down an also giant robot spaceship.

I like that we got this song out of it.

I like Garrus Vakarian.

I like Liara T'Soni.

I like Tali'Zorah vas Normandy.

I like James Vega.

I like Kaidan Alenko.

I like Admiral David Anderson.

I like Mordin Solus.

I like Krogan Eve.

I like Legion of the Geth.

I like the Justicar Samara.

I like Jack.

I like Miranda Lawson.

I like Thane Krios.

I like Jacob Taylor.

I like Kasumi Goto.

I like Commander Shepard.

I like the characters.

I like the universe.

I like the story.

I like Mass Effect 3.

Thanks for reading and I'll see you next time!

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

My Little Guilty Pleasure



Yep. This. I'm doing a blog on this. Lord have mercy, I'm doing a blog about...THIS. I suppose I have to revoke my Man Card now.

Hasbro is an interesting little corporate entity, ennit? In 1964, they found a way to market dolls to boys and changed the face of the toy industry forever with two simple words: "Action Figure". In 1982, they came up with a new whole new way to sell their product: the tie-in shows, which led to the rise of two juggernauts of the 80's, G.I. Joe and Transformers. They also tried to repeat their success by creating a toy line aimed at the female demographic. The result was 1986's animated series My Little Pony.

If internet critic Lindsey "Nostalgia Chick" Ellis is to be believed, the original MLP show is less fondly remembered than it's big brothers (when it's being remembered at all). The characters were ill-defined and the conflict ranged from petty disagreements to nonexistent (because girls don't like conflict in their stories, naturally). MLP survived as a franchise and had hiccuped now and then throughout the nineties and two-thousands with new toys or an animated special here and there, but never really found the same level of success as Transformers or GI Joe (which may very well be a blessing. Do you really want to see Michael Bay's My Little Pony?) (Actually, that could be hilarious). However, in Fall of 2010, something completely unexpected happen: MLP became popular. And it was all thanks to a new animated series on The Hub, My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic.

Developed by animation veteran Lauren Faust (late of The Powerpuff Girls and Foster's Home for Imaginary Friends), FIM struck a chord not only with it's intended audience of young girls, but also with the very vocal demographic of males age 20 and up. The so-called "bronies" carved a strong internet presence for themselves and their fandom made the show far more well-known and noteworthy than it otherwise might have been. Being something of a media-soak myself, I was curious and fascinated by this new fandom, and wanted to know the reason behind it; why was a kids cartoon aimed at girls becoming so big with grown-ass men? What was the hook to it? Everytime I asked, I got the same answer: "It's just good writing." Not the most difinitive answer to my question. When I discovered that the series was now available for streaming on Netflix, I got to watching, and now, ten episodes in, I can safely say that I get the appeal.

Let me explain the premise in a way that won't lead to me wanting to shoot myself. In a mystical far-off land (where, much like C.S. Lewis's Narnia, the mythology is a hodge-podge mashup of whatever the writers feel like pulling from, be it Greek, Norse, or Bullshit), Pony Jesus rules benevolently over the anatomically incorrent four-hooved citizens of the realm. Her apprentice, Aspergers Pony, is exiled from the capitol and sent to live in a peasant village to get a real job. This job is basically keeping the citizens of the village from killing each other (Not unlike Hawke from Dragon Age II). Specifically, she must constantly make peace between the other core five characters: Redneck Pony, Social Anxiety Pony, OCD Pony, Compensating For Something Pony, and Habitual Crack User Pony. Together with Aspergers Pony's assistant, Closeted Gay Lizardman, the ponies defend the village from all manner of threats, include petty differences, racism, pollution, a plague of locusts, and the return of Pony Lucifer. And if I write the word "Pony" one more time, my keyboard may explode.

FIM has some good things going for it: For starters, the animation is outstanding. Fluid and dynamic, brightly colored, with consistent aesthetic. The characters, while often extreme, are likable and relatable in their own ways. And, god help me, the writing is actually good. There's genuine conflict (most of the time), the lessons are simple without being too preachy, and character interactions are dynamic enough not to be repetitive while consistent enough to be believable.

The best word I can use to describe FIM is "Harmless". It's a rice cake with powdered sugar: not really bad for you and sweet without being disgusting. Like I said before, the first season is up on Netflix, so maybe take a look and decide for yourself what you think. Now if you'll excuse me, I have to go hang my head in shame for a while. See ya next time!

Tuesday, March 13, 2012

Of Adaptations and Endings

Hello again, readers and friends. As I said in my last post, internet-type guy MovieBob is sort of my inspiration for doing this blog. Since he occasionally does episodes of his popular culture commentary program "The Big Picture" that are composed of smaller ideas that have yet to be stretched out into full episodes (called "The Junk Drawer"), I figured I might as well do the same thing. A few things have caught my geeky sort of fancy in the past week, and I figured I might as well spill my guts here. So here it is, some things that interest me...I should really come up with a better name for this...

John Carter


This past weekend so the release of Disney's John Carter (Disney: The first distributor ever to do summer blockbusters in the Winter!), based on the literally 100-year-old Barsoom series of pulp adventures written by Edgar Rice Burroughs. John Carter of Mars, as the franchise is referred to, is considered the pretext to most of the great works of sci-fi and fantasy in the 20th century, having inspired the likes of Flash Gordon, which inspired Buck Rogers, which inspired Star Wars, which inspired a whole bunch of stuff, and so on. And now that we live in an age of high-budget special effects and brand-name recognition being the key to success, it's only natural that Burroughs's version of the Red Planet become the next great Hollywood blockbuster. And yet...it doesn't look that good.

In its opening weekend, John Carter made $30 million domestic and $70 million internationally, making for a total of $100 million (those high school math classes really paid off, didn't they?). Now, a sane person would be overjoyed at the prospect of making a tenth of that money over three days, but remember, this is Hollywood. John Carter is estimated to have cost $250 million, which means that its impressive opening weekend raked in enough money to pay the special effects guy who made Tars Tarkas have green skin. So why did this movie do so (relatively) bad at the box office?

For starters, the advertising. Omitting any mention of Mars, Barsoom, space, green four-armed people, etc. from the title of the movie buries the lead. A movie called John Carter just sounds...boring. You have a space epic involving alien lizard men, giant ape monsters, and a wicked hot red-skinned lady in skimpy dress (seriously, this movie is worth seeing for Lynn Collins alone. She kills it in the movie and looks jaw-droppingly fantastic while doing it). Show off what you got!

Next comes the fact that there wasn't as much merchandising. Disney shot themselves in the foot when they didn't release all nine books in the Barsoom series together, or any toys to promote the film. This is a part of Hollywood that I know very little about (as opposed to the rest of the film industry, which I clearly have a masters degree in), but doesn't it seem like a kid would get more excited about a John Carter movie if he had a John Carter action figure with kung-fu grip and little plastic swords he can stab himself in the eye with? I sure would be.

Finally, there were the reviews: They weren't positive. Last I checked, Rotten Tomatoes has the movie at 51% approval, or by high school standards, an F. And, admittedly, the film is flawed. The pacing is slow, the mythology is mostly dull, the Thark race is the most interesting part of the movie and they're mostly a B-Story, the villains range from boring to confusing, and Taylor Kitsch is only servicable as an action hero. However, I still had a lot of fun with it. The action works, the visuals are awesome, there's genuine comedy in it, and, again, Lynn Collins kills it as Dejah Thoris. I'm asking you to please, PLEASE see this movie; if it gets a sequel, it'd probably be a lot better.

The Lorax


Beating John Carter at the box office was The Lorax, Illumination Entertainment's adaptation of Dr. Seuss's 1971 children's book. This film has captured my interest without me having to see it because of the baggage it brings as an adaptation.

See, based solely on speculation, my generation seemes to be much more nostalgic than the previous ones. I think it's because our nostalgia is more rooted in the media we absorbed as children, and how entertainment in the late 80's/early 90's was more specialized than it was at other times and children's entertainment in particular was more distinct and varied. That's why it interests me whenever people dig up relics of their nostalgia and point out the more intellectual aspects of it that they can see now that they're adults. Dr. Seuss's books a prime example of this because they're, to a degree, universal and because a lot of them do have bigger ideas at work. "The Sneetches" was about antisemitism. "Yertle the Turtle" was about Nazi Germany. "How the Grinch Stole Christmas" was a reinterpretation of the Germanic epic poem Beowulf, told from the perspective of its initial villain, the monster Grendel. Likewise, "The Lorax" was blantantly about environmentalism.

A lot of the reviews I'm seeing for the Lorax movie is that it's broad message gets lost or is undercut. The book was a bleak cautionary tale about the dangers of overconsumption and short-sighted business practices; it's pretty much an anti-corporate message. The movie tries the same thing, despite the fact that it has 70 corporate tie-ins, including an SUV. Furthermore, it apparently changes the antagonistic Once-Ler's character from an opportunistic businessman to a wide-eyed innocent led astray by his greedy family. The primary antagonist of the film becomes corporate head Aloysius O'Hare, a man so cartoonishly evil, he's one business venture away from making enemies with Captain Planet and the Planeteers.

The reason The Lorax movie fascinates me is because when I first saw the trailer (because my ADD-rattled brain doesn't recognize a movie as existing until it's being pitched to me), I wondered if Hollywood could take a book so renowned for its style and its message, stretch it into ninety minutes, and keep the style and message in tact. In short: No, apparently they couldn't. But, I probably shouldn't say, as I haven't actually seen the damn thing. Maybe I'll catch a matinee sometime this week, because god knows I'm not paying a full ten bucks for this crap.

Mass Effect 3


A week ago saw the release of Mass Effect 3, the conclusion to Bioware's video game trilogy. The Mass Effect games have been highly praised for their storytelling and characterization, and that's on full display in the third game. However, the ending of the game and series has gotten a lot of people angry, and I guess I can see where they're coming from, but I really don't have a problem with it, and I'll tell you why. Incidentally, I'm going to be absolutely spoiling the ending, so be warned.

Set in the distance 26th century, Mass Effect follows the exploits of intergalactic soldier Commander Shepard, and his ongoing attmept to prepare for the coming of the Reapers, a race of ancient machines who wipe out nearly all organic life in the universe every 50,000 years. Mass Effect 3 begins with the Reapers landing on Earth and taking over, driving Shepard and his allies off and forcing them to forge new alliances across the galaxy and build an army to take on the Reapers, while simultaneous ensuring the creation of "The Crucible", a weapon that is capable of destroying every Reaper across the universe.

The final hours of the game are Shepard's assault on Earth, as he fights of Reaper ground troops and makes his way to the catalyst that will ensure the Crucible's functionality. When he gets there, after friends and enemies have died and he himself has been gravely injured, Shepherd is confronted by the Crucible itself, an AI that explains the Reaper's goals and origins and explains how Shepard can defeat them.

What Shepard does is decided by choices the player makes not only throughout the game, but throughtout the previous two games. One of the impressive things about the Mass Effect series is that players can import their saves from old one into new ones; i.e. the Commander Shepard a player created and made choices with in Mass Effect 1 can carry on to Mass Effect 2 and 3, which changes the events of each game based on the previous ones. Yet with the ending of Mass Effect 3, the three different methods of defeating the Reapers all have essentially the same results: Shepard dies, the Reapers stop attacking Earth, the mass relays (the technology through which intergalactic travel is made possible) are destroyed and Shepard's allies survive, albeit having crashed and stranded on an alien world. Many gamers have taken the endings as Bioware saying, "Hey, remember when we said your choices in the previous games had weight and meaning in the series? Well forget that! We're too lazy to think of different endings, so here's this one played again three times!"

The gaming community has not taken this well. Polls and petitions have gone up across the internet, asking Bioware to release downloadable content that will change the ending of the game, providing more diversity and closure to this epic narrative. To an extent, I get what they're saying; something as big as Mass Effect deserves a conclusion that feels like the culmination of three games worth of space travel, grand heroes, larger-than-life villains, love, loss and intergalactic adventure. But really, I don't mind the ending, mostly because of my personal experience with it.

See, before the assault on Earth, I assumed that it was possible for Shepard to fail his mission and for the Reapers to continue their mass extinction without anything to stop them. This means that during the final mission, every time someone said something about the allied forces losing, my heart seized up, and I worried that a galaxy of sentient life was about to go down the toilet because I screwed up. So when I got to the end and Shepard sacrificed himself to destroy the Reapers, I was relieved. I was happy in my success and cautiously optimistic that my allies did survive. And really, I was just happy with the story. To dust off an old quote, "It's not the destination, it's the journey". Everything building up to that final moment on the Crucible was an emotional roller coaster and a fantastic story. Mass Effect 3 is an excellent game, regardless of the ending, and that's all there is to it.



Whew. That was longer than I expected. Still, fun. If you have any thoughts on those things I talked about, send 'em my way. If you have any ideas on what I should talk about, do the same. I'll see you next time.